- 1New York Yankees126
- 2Los Angeles Angels108
- 3Cincinnati Reds103
Break Analyzer Report
Your break
Highlights
The standout pulls, ranked.- 1New York Yankees14
- 2Cincinnati Reds13
- 3Texas Rangers11
- 1New York Yankees10
- 2Atlanta Braves6
- 3Cincinnati Reds6
- 1Arizona Diamondbacks16
- 2Cincinnati Reds14
- 3Texas Rangers12
- 1Cincinnati Reds20
- 2New York Yankees18
- 3Arizona Diamondbacks18
- 1Montreal Expos8
- 2Houston Astros19
- 3Pittsburgh Pirates36
- 1Arizona Diamondbacks30/100
- 2Colorado Rockies23.4/100
- 3New York Mets22/100
- 1Arizona Diamondbacks+2.8pp
- 1Aramis Ramirez — Milwaukee Brewers3
- 2Cal Ripken — Baltimore Orioles3
- 3Chris Sale — Chicago White Sox3
All teams
Hover any column header for what it means. Click a row for player detail.Team | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New York Yankees | 126 | 14 | 18 | 8 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 6.7% | 6% | 10 | 4 | |
| Los Angeles Angels | 108 | 7 | 10 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 5.8% | 3.3% | 4 | 3 | |
| Cincinnati Reds | 103 | 13 | 20 | 14 | 0 | 16 | 6 | 5.5% | 6.7% | 6 | 7 | |
| Texas Rangers | 94 | 11 | 17 | 12 | 0 | 16 | 5 | 5% | 5.7% | 5 | 6 | |
| Washington Nationals | 92 | 9 | 14 | 10 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 4.9% | 4.7% | 4 | 5 | |
| Baltimore Orioles | 85 | 10 | 15 | 10 | 0 | 16 | 5 | 4.6% | 5% | 5 | 5 | |
| Atlanta Braves | 82 | 10 | 14 | 8 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 4.4% | 4.7% | 6 | 4 | |
| Detroit Tigers | 76 | 7 | 10 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 4.1% | 3.3% | 4 | 3 | |
| Los Angeles Dodgers | 71 | 7 | 10 | 6 | 0 | 14 | 4 | 3.8% | 3.3% | 4 | 3 | |
| Kansas City Royals | 69 | 9 | 13 | 8 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 3.7% | 4.3% | 5 | 4 | |
| Seattle Mariners | 63 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 3.4% | 1.7% | 3 | 1 | |
| Philadelphia Phillies | 61 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 12 | 4 | 3.3% | 2.7% | 4 | 2 | |
| Toronto Blue Jays | 61 | 8 | 12 | 8 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 3.3% | 4% | 4 | 4 | |
| Arizona Diamondbacks | 60 | 10 | 18 | 16 | 0 | 18 | 2 | 3.2% | 6% | 2 | 8 | |
| New York Mets | 59 | 7 | 13 | 12 | 0 | 16 | 1 | 3.2% | 4.3% | 1 | 6 | |
| Chicago White Sox | 58 | 7 | 10 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3.1% | 3.3% | 4 | 3 | |
| St. Louis Cardinals | 58 | 6 | 9 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 3.1% | 3% | 3 | 3 | |
| Miami Marlins | 51 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 14 | 1 | 2.7% | 2.3% | 1 | 3 | |
| Tampa Bay Rays | 51 | 7 | 11 | 8 | 0 | 10 | 3 | 2.7% | 3.7% | 3 | 4 | |
| Chicago Cubs | 49 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 0 | 14 | 2 | 2.6% | 2.7% | 2 | 3 | |
| San Francisco Giants | 49 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 2.6% | 1% | 3 | 0 | |
| Milwaukee Brewers | 48 | 6 | 9 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2.6% | 3% | 3 | 3 | |
| Oakland A's | 48 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2.6% | 1.3% | 2 | 1 | |
| Colorado Rockies | 47 | 7 | 11 | 8 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 2.5% | 3.7% | 3 | 4 | |
| Minnesota Twins | 46 | 6 | 10 | 8 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2.5% | 3.3% | 2 | 4 | |
| Boston Red Sox | 40 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 2.1% | 1.3% | 2 | 1 | |
| San Diego Padres | 39 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 2.1% | 2% | 2 | 2 | |
| Pittsburgh Pirates | 36 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 1 | 1.9% | 0.3% | 1 | 0 | |
| Cleveland Indians | 36 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1.9% | 2.3% | 1 | 3 | |
| Houston Astros | 19 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1% | 1% | 1 | 1 | |
| Montreal Expos | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.4% | 0% | 0 | 0 | |
| Break total | 1867 | 200 | 300 | 200 | 0 | 252 | 100 | 100% | 100% | 100 | 100 | |
By division
Card volume per team, ranked like standings. Bar = cards · green = hits.MLB
- 1New York Yankees18h126
- 2Baltimore Orioles15h85
- 3Toronto Blue Jays12h61
- 4Tampa Bay Rays11h51
- 5Boston Red Sox4h40
- 1Washington Nationals14h92
- 2Atlanta Braves14h82
- 3Philadelphia Phillies8h61
- 4New York Mets13h59
- 5Miami Marlins7h51
- 1Cincinnati Reds20h103
- 2St. Louis Cardinals9h58
- 3Chicago Cubs8h49
- 4Milwaukee Brewers9h48
- 5Pittsburgh Pirates1h36
- 1Los Angeles Angels10h108
- 2Texas Rangers17h94
- 3Seattle Mariners5h63
- 4Houston Astros3h19
- 1Los Angeles Dodgers10h71
- 2Arizona Diamondbacks18h60
- 3San Francisco Giants3h49
- 4Colorado Rockies11h47
- 5San Diego Padres6h39
- 1Detroit Tigers10h76
- 2Kansas City Royals13h69
- 3Chicago White Sox10h58
- 4Minnesota Twins10h46
Methodology
Card % / Hit % — share, not odds. Card % and Hit % are each team's share of the checklist — the cards printed in these sets — computed exactly from what's listed. They are not the probability of pulling any given card, which would require print runs Panini doesn't publish.
Implied value. "Value" here means checklist-defined scarcity, not market price — a card counts as a hit if it's serial-numbered, an autograph, or a memorabilia relic. Packaddx doesn't price cards, so these numbers describe what's printed, not what it's worth.
Multi-team cards. A card printed with more than one team (e.g. a dual-team insert) counts under every team it's printed for, so per-team totals can add up to more than the break's overall card count. Each physical card is still only counted once in the break's totals.
Team attribution. A card is attributed to whichever team is printed on it at the time of the set's release — not a player's current or most recent team.
