- 1Seattle Mariners15
- 2Chicago White Sox14
- 3Boston Red Sox14
Break Analyzer Report
Your break
Highlights
The standout pulls, ranked.- 1St. Louis Cardinals4
- 2Boston Red Sox3
- 3Kansas City Royals2
- 1Kansas City Royals0
- 2Baltimore Orioles0
- 3Washington Nationals0
- 1Seattle Mariners6
- 2Texas Rangers5
- 3Miami Marlins5
- 1Seattle Mariners6
- 2Texas Rangers5
- 3Miami Marlins5
- 1Baltimore Orioles1
- 2Washington Nationals3
- 3Minnesota Twins3
- 1Los Angeles Angels50/100
- 2San Diego Padres44.4/100
- 3Texas Rangers41.7/100
No hidden-value teams in this break — hit share tracks card share closely across the board.
- 1George Springer — Houston Astros1
- 2Gregory Polanco — Pittsburgh Pirates1
- 3Jose Abreu — Chicago White Sox1
All teams
Hover any column header for what it means. Click a row for player detail.Team | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seattle Mariners | 15 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 6.7% | 8.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Chicago White Sox | 14 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 6.3% | 5.6% | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| Boston Red Sox | 14 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 6.3% | 5.6% | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| St. Louis Cardinals | 13 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 5.8% | 4.2% | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
| Miami Marlins | 13 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 5.8% | 6.9% | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Texas Rangers | 12 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 5.4% | 6.9% | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Houston Astros | 12 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 5.4% | 4.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| New York Yankees | 12 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 5.4% | 5.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Detroit Tigers | 11 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 4.9% | 5.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| New York Mets | 10 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 4.5% | 2.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| San Diego Padres | 9 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 4% | 5.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Arizona Diamondbacks | 9 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 4% | 4.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Toronto Blue Jays | 8 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 3.6% | 4.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Cincinnati Reds | 8 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 3.6% | 2.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Pittsburgh Pirates | 7 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 3.1% | 2.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Los Angeles Dodgers | 6 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 2.7% | 2.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Atlanta Braves | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2.2% | 1.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Colorado Rockies | 5 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2.2% | 2.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Philadelphia Phillies | 5 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2.2% | 2.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Cleveland Indians | 5 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2.2% | 2.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| San Francisco Giants | 5 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2.2% | 2.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Kansas City Royals | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1.8% | 0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Milwaukee Brewers | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1.8% | 1.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Los Angeles Angels | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1.8% | 2.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Tampa Bay Rays | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1.8% | 1.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Washington Nationals | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1.3% | 1.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Minnesota Twins | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1.3% | 1.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Chicago Cubs | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1.3% | 1.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Baltimore Orioles | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.4% | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Break total | 224 | 27 | 72 | 72 | 0 | 224 | 0 | 100% | 100% | 1 | 11 | 15 | |
By division
Card volume per team, ranked like standings. Bar = cards · green = hits.MLB
- 1Seattle Mariners6h15
- 2Houston Astros3h12
- 3Texas Rangers5h12
- 4Los Angeles Angels2h4
- 1Boston Red Sox4h14
- 2New York Yankees4h12
- 3Toronto Blue Jays3h8
- 4Tampa Bay Rays1h4
- 5Baltimore Orioles1
- 1Miami Marlins5h13
- 2New York Mets2h10
- 3Atlanta Braves1h5
- 4Philadelphia Phillies2h5
- 5Washington Nationals1h3
- 1St. Louis Cardinals3h13
- 2Cincinnati Reds2h8
- 3Pittsburgh Pirates2h7
- 4Milwaukee Brewers1h4
- 5Chicago Cubs1h3
- 1Arizona Diamondbacks3h9
- 2San Diego Padres4h9
- 3Los Angeles Dodgers2h6
- 4Colorado Rockies2h5
- 5San Francisco Giants2h5
- 1Chicago White Sox4h14
- 2Detroit Tigers4h11
- 3Kansas City Royals4
- 4Minnesota Twins1h3
Methodology
Card % / Hit % — share, not odds. Card % and Hit % are each team's share of the checklist — the cards printed in these sets — computed exactly from what's listed. They are not the probability of pulling any given card, which would require print runs Panini doesn't publish.
Implied value. "Value" here means checklist-defined scarcity, not market price — a card counts as a hit if it's serial-numbered, an autograph, or a memorabilia relic. Packaddx doesn't price cards, so these numbers describe what's printed, not what it's worth.
Multi-team cards. A card printed with more than one team (e.g. a dual-team insert) counts under every team it's printed for, so per-team totals can add up to more than the break's overall card count. Each physical card is still only counted once in the break's totals.
Team attribution. A card is attributed to whichever team is printed on it at the time of the set's release — not a player's current or most recent team.
