- 1Kansas City Royals184
- 2Chicago Cubs158
- 3Toronto Blue Jays145
2014 Panini Baseball Prizm Perennial Draft Picks
Break Analyzer Report
2763Total cards
1089Hits
2194Numbered
3381-of-1s
31Teams
Your break
2014 Panini Baseball Prizm Perennial Draft Picks
Highlights
The standout pulls, ranked.- 1Kansas City Royals144
- 2Chicago Cubs127
- 3Toronto Blue Jays117
- 1Kansas City Royals22
- 2Chicago Cubs22
- 3Toronto Blue Jays17
- 1Cincinnati Reds60
- 2Toronto Blue Jays57
- 3Milwaukee Brewers51
- 1Cincinnati Reds67
- 2Toronto Blue Jays67
- 3Kansas City Royals66
- 1Kansas City Athletics3
- 2Baltimore Orioles14
- 3Atlanta Braves43
- 1Texas Rangers58.2/100
- 2Cincinnati Reds48.2/100
- 3Cleveland Indians46.5/100
No hidden-value teams in this break — hit share tracks card share closely across the board.
- 1Aaron Nola — Philadelphia Phillies13
- 2Alex Jackson — Seattle Mariners13
- 3Carlos Rodon — Chicago White Sox13
All teams
Hover any column header for what it means. Click a row for player detail.Team | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kansas City Royals | 184 | 144 | 66 | 51 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 6.7% | 6.1% | 22 | 22 | 2 | 16 | 0 | 16 | 16 | 18 | 16 | 16 | |
| Chicago Cubs | 158 | 127 | 62 | 47 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 5.7% | 5.7% | 22 | 24 | 4 | 12 | 1 | 12 | 12 | 16 | 12 | 12 | |
| Toronto Blue Jays | 145 | 117 | 67 | 57 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 5.2% | 6.2% | 17 | 18 | 1 | 13 | 1 | 13 | 13 | 15 | 13 | 13 | |
| Cincinnati Reds | 139 | 112 | 67 | 60 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 5% | 6.2% | 15 | 16 | 2 | 13 | 1 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | |
| Milwaukee Brewers | 134 | 108 | 60 | 51 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 4.8% | 5.5% | 16 | 16 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 12 | 12 | 14 | 12 | 12 | |
| Boston Red Sox | 124 | 98 | 46 | 36 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 4.5% | 4.2% | 16 | 17 | 2 | 10 | 1 | 10 | 10 | 12 | 10 | 10 | |
| Chicago White Sox | 124 | 98 | 46 | 36 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 4.5% | 4.2% | 14 | 15 | 0 | 11 | 1 | 11 | 11 | 13 | 11 | 11 | |
| Colorado Rockies | 122 | 96 | 42 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 4.4% | 3.9% | 16 | 16 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 13 | 10 | 10 | |
| New York Yankees | 117 | 91 | 41 | 31 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 4.2% | 3.8% | 14 | 14 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 12 | 10 | 10 | |
| Philadelphia Phillies | 112 | 87 | 30 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 4.1% | 2.8% | 14 | 15 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 9 | 9 | 12 | 9 | 9 | |
| Pittsburgh Pirates | 108 | 86 | 44 | 36 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 3.9% | 4% | 12 | 12 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 12 | 10 | 10 | |
| Detroit Tigers | 94 | 74 | 38 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 3.4% | 3.5% | 12 | 12 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | |
| Los Angeles Angels | 94 | 74 | 42 | 36 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 3.4% | 3.9% | 10 | 10 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | |
| Seattle Mariners | 91 | 75 | 39 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 3.3% | 3.6% | 13 | 14 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 11 | 7 | 7 | |
| Miami Marlins | 88 | 69 | 34 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 3.2% | 3.1% | 10 | 10 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | |
| Cleveland Indians | 86 | 70 | 40 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 3.1% | 3.7% | 12 | 12 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 9 | 7 | 7 | |
| St. Louis Cardinals | 85 | 67 | 33 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 3.1% | 3% | 9 | 9 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | |
| Los Angeles Dodgers | 82 | 64 | 26 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 3% | 2.4% | 10 | 10 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 9 | 7 | 7 | |
| Houston Astros | 77 | 62 | 31 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 2.8% | 2.8% | 11 | 11 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 6 | |
| Arizona Diamondbacks | 71 | 56 | 31 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 2.6% | 2.8% | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | |
| Oakland A's | 71 | 56 | 31 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 2.6% | 2.8% | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | |
| San Diego Padres | 70 | 55 | 24 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 2.5% | 2.2% | 8 | 9 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 6 | |
| Texas Rangers | 67 | 56 | 39 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 2.4% | 3.6% | 11 | 11 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 5 | |
| San Francisco Giants | 65 | 51 | 23 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2.4% | 2.1% | 6 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | |
| Minnesota Twins | 60 | 47 | 20 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 2.2% | 1.8% | 10 | 10 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 4 | |
| Tampa Bay Rays | 57 | 46 | 25 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 2.1% | 2.3% | 7 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | |
| Washington Nationals | 53 | 42 | 22 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1.9% | 2% | 6 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | |
| New York Mets | 45 | 36 | 17 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 1.6% | 1.6% | 7 | 8 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | |
| Atlanta Braves | 43 | 36 | 17 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 1.6% | 1.6% | 7 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 3 | |
| Baltimore Orioles | 14 | 11 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0.5% | 0.4% | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| Kansas City Athletics | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.1% | 0.1% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| Break total | 2763 | 2194 | 1089 | 862 | 0 | 0 | 338 | 100% | 100% | 338 | 348 | 22 | 238 | 10 | 238 | 238 | 286 | 238 | 238 | |
23 more below
Card % and Hit % describe the checklist, not the odds. They show each team's share of what's printed in these sets — exact from the checklist. They are not the probability of pulling a card, which would require print runs Panini doesn't publish.
By division
Card volume per team, ranked like standings. Bar = cards · green = hits.MLB
NL Central266 hits · 624 cards · 500 #d
- 1Chicago Cubs62h158
- 2Cincinnati Reds67h139
- 3Milwaukee Brewers60h134
- 4Pittsburgh Pirates44h108
- 5St. Louis Cardinals33h85
AL Central170 hits · 462 cards · 363 #d
- 1Kansas City Royals66h184
- 2Chicago White Sox46h124
- 3Detroit Tigers38h94
- 4Minnesota Twins20h60
AL East183 hits · 457 cards · 363 #d
- 1Toronto Blue Jays67h145
- 2Boston Red Sox46h124
- 3New York Yankees41h117
- 4Tampa Bay Rays25h57
- 5Baltimore Orioles4h14
NL West146 hits · 410 cards · 322 #d
- 1Colorado Rockies42h122
- 2Los Angeles Dodgers26h82
- 3Arizona Diamondbacks31h71
- 4San Diego Padres24h70
- 5San Francisco Giants23h65
NL East120 hits · 341 cards · 270 #d
- 1Philadelphia Phillies30h112
- 2Miami Marlins34h88
- 3Washington Nationals22h53
- 4New York Mets17h45
- 5Atlanta Braves17h43
AL West152 hits · 332 cards · 270 #d
- 1Los Angeles Angels42h94
- 2Seattle Mariners39h91
- 3Houston Astros31h77
- 4Texas Rangers39h67
- 5Athletics1h3
Methodology
Card % / Hit % — share, not odds. Card % and Hit % are each team's share of the checklist — the cards printed in these sets — computed exactly from what's listed. They are not the probability of pulling any given card, which would require print runs Panini doesn't publish.
Implied value. "Value" here means checklist-defined scarcity, not market price — a card counts as a hit if it's serial-numbered, an autograph, or a memorabilia relic. Packaddx doesn't price cards, so these numbers describe what's printed, not what it's worth.
Multi-team cards. A card printed with more than one team (e.g. a dual-team insert) counts under every team it's printed for, so per-team totals can add up to more than the break's overall card count. Each physical card is still only counted once in the break's totals.
Team attribution. A card is attributed to whichever team is printed on it at the time of the set's release — not a player's current or most recent team.