2022 Panini Basketball Playoff Contenders Optic

Break Analyzer Report

4939Total cards
1461Hits
3535Numbered
10091-of-1s
32Teams

Your break

2022 Panini Basketball Playoff Contenders Optic

Highlights

The standout pulls, ranked.

Most total cards

Teams projected to receive the most cards
  1. 1Oklahoma City Thunder248
  2. 2Houston Rockets241
  3. 3Dallas Mavericks232

Most numbered

Most serial-numbered cards
  1. 1Houston Rockets175
  2. 2Oklahoma City Thunder167
  3. 3Detroit Pistons164

Most 1/1s

Most one-of-one cards
  1. 1Dallas Mavericks47
  2. 2Oklahoma City Thunder47
  3. 3Houston Rockets46

Most autos

Most autograph cards
  1. 1Boston Celtics46
  2. 2Los Angeles Lakers29
  3. 3Dallas Mavericks28

Most hits

Autos + relics + 1/1s combined
  1. 1Boston Celtics74
  2. 2Dallas Mavericks71
  3. 3Houston Rockets66

Fewest total cards

Teams least likely to appear
  1. 1New Jersey Nets7
  2. 2Seattle Supersonics10
  3. 3Brooklyn Nets71

Best hit density

Most hits per 100 cards
  1. 1Seattle Supersonics100/100
  2. 2Boston Celtics42.5/100
  3. 3Brooklyn Nets36.6/100

Hidden value

Hit share beats card share by 2+ points

No hidden-value teams in this break — hit share tracks card share closely across the board.

Top players in this break

Most hits across every team
  1. 1Ja Morant — Memphis Grizzlies19
  2. 2Jayson Tatum — Boston Celtics19
  3. 3Luka Doncic — Dallas Mavericks19

All teams

Hover any column header for what it means. Click a row for player detail.
Team
Count info
#d info
Hits info
Autos info
Relics info
RCs info
1/1s info
Card % info
Hit % info
/1 info
/10 info
/15 info
/25 info
/35 info
/45 info
/49 info
/60 info
/75 info
/99 info
/125 info
Oklahoma City Thunder2481675510072475%3.8%4736527059027101
Houston Rockets2411756625090464.9%4.5%46386260512125142
Dallas Mavericks2321607128036474.7%4.9%4733823061022191
Detroit Pistons2321646120072454.7%4.2%45356250510124112
Memphis Grizzlies2151545924054394.4%4%39356231411121112
San Antonio Spurs2041495720088414.1%3.9%41325210511021112
Denver Nuggets1991436024054404%4.1%40306200510119102
Indiana Pacers1951375215054403.9%3.6%402862005811982
Utah Jazz1871345419072383.8%3.7%3828618051011792
Portland Trail Blazers1861305115036393.8%3.5%392651905701991
Los Angeles Lakers1831296029036363.7%4.1%362752004811972
New Orleans Pelicans1751315320054373.5%3.6%37276170511016111
Boston Celtics174126744600363.5%5.1%362662004721753
Golden State Warriors1731235424036343.5%3.7%342661804821681
Sacramento Kings1731225120036353.5%3.5%352541904601982
Milwaukee Bucks1691174615036343.4%3.1%342441804601881
Orlando Magic1681255425054343.4%3.7%3426418049018102
Phoenix Suns154105401000323.1%2.7%322151604511551
Atlanta Hawks1471054315036313%2.9%312141504601563
New York Knicks143103365018322.9%2.5%322061205811180
Minnesota Timberwolves133943410018262.7%2.3%262041403711351
Charlotte Hornets133974115036292.7%2.8%291941304601372
Cleveland Cavaliers127934220018262.6%2.9%261931403501490
Toronto Raptors119893915018272.4%2.7%271741104701171
Washington Wizards114843410036262.3%2.3%261641004601062
Miami Heat112853815036262.3%2.6%261641004601072
Philadelphia 76ers11278351400232.3%2.4%23165110352931
Los Angeles Clippers103753010018222.1%2.1%221531003501061
Chicago Bulls100743418018202%2.3%201621202401152
Brooklyn Nets7153261000181.4%1.8%189360330650
Seattle Supersonics101010100020.2%0.7%22020000202
New Jersey Nets74100010.1%0.1%11010000100
24 more below
Card % and Hit % describe the checklist, not the odds. They show each team's share of what's printed in these sets — exact from the checklist. They are not the probability of pulling a card, which would require print runs Panini doesn't publish.

By division

Card volume per team, ranked like standings. Bar = cards · green = hits.

NBA

Southwest306 hits · 1067 cards · 769 #d
  1. 1
    Houston Rockets
    66h241
  2. 2
    Dallas Mavericks
    71h232
  3. 3
    Memphis Grizzlies
    59h215
  4. 4
    San Antonio Spurs
    57h204
  5. 5
    New Orleans Pelicans
    53h175
Northwest254 hits · 953 cards · 668 #d
  1. 1
    Oklahoma City Thunder
    55h248
  2. 2
    Denver Nuggets
    60h199
  3. 3
    Utah Jazz
    54h187
  4. 4
    Portland Trail Blazers
    51h186
  5. 5
    Minnesota Timberwolves
    34h133
Central235 hits · 823 cards · 585 #d
  1. 1
    Detroit Pistons
    61h232
  2. 2
    Indiana Pacers
    52h195
  3. 3
    Milwaukee Bucks
    46h169
  4. 4
    Cleveland Cavaliers
    42h127
  5. 5
    Chicago Bulls
    34h100
Pacific235 hits · 786 cards · 554 #d
  1. 1
    Los Angeles Lakers
    60h183
  2. 2
    Golden State Warriors
    54h173
  3. 3
    Sacramento Kings
    51h173
  4. 4
    Phoenix Suns
    40h154
  5. 5
    Los Angeles Clippers
    30h103
Southeast210 hits · 674 cards · 496 #d
  1. 1
    Orlando Magic
    54h168
  2. 2
    Atlanta Hawks
    43h147
  3. 3
    Charlotte Hornets
    41h133
  4. 4
    Washington Wizards
    34h114
  5. 5
    Miami Heat
    38h112
Atlantic210 hits · 619 cards · 449 #d
  1. 1
    Boston Celtics
    74h174
  2. 2
    New York Knicks
    36h143
  3. 3
    Toronto Raptors
    39h119
  4. 4
    Philadelphia 76ers
    35h112
  5. 5
    Brooklyn Nets
    26h71

Methodology

Card % / Hit % — share, not odds. Card % and Hit % are each team's share of the checklist — the cards printed in these sets — computed exactly from what's listed. They are not the probability of pulling any given card, which would require print runs Panini doesn't publish.

Implied value. "Value" here means checklist-defined scarcity, not market price — a card counts as a hit if it's serial-numbered, an autograph, or a memorabilia relic. Packaddx doesn't price cards, so these numbers describe what's printed, not what it's worth.

Multi-team cards. A card printed with more than one team (e.g. a dual-team insert) counts under every team it's printed for, so per-team totals can add up to more than the break's overall card count. Each physical card is still only counted once in the break's totals.

Team attribution. A card is attributed to whichever team is printed on it at the time of the set's release — not a player's current or most recent team.