- 1New York Giants93
- 2Washington Redskins92
- 3Oakland Raiders84
2011 Panini Football Playoff Contenders
Break Analyzer Report
2020Total cards
964Hits
1525Numbered
9641-of-1s
36Teams
Your break
2011 Panini Football Playoff Contenders
Highlights
The standout pulls, ranked.- 1New York Giants75
- 2Washington Redskins69
- 3Oakland Raiders63
- 1New York Giants55
- 2Kansas City Chiefs43
- 3Baltimore Ravens42
- 1Washington Redskins0
- 2Cleveland Browns0
- 3Arizona Cardinals0
- 1New York Giants55
- 2Kansas City Chiefs43
- 3Baltimore Ravens42
- 1Houston Oilers4
- 2Baltimore Colts6
- 3Los Angeles Raiders9
- 1New York Giants59.1/100
- 2Kansas City Chiefs58.1/100
- 3Seattle Seahawks58/100
No hidden-value teams in this break — hit share tracks card share closely across the board.
- 1Cam Newton — Carolina Panthers10
- 2Andy Dalton — Cincinnati Bengals10
- 3Blaine Gabbert — Jacksonville Jaguars10
All teams
Hover any column header for what it means. Click a row for player detail.Team | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New York Giants | 93 | 75 | 55 | 0 | 0 | 64 | 55 | 4.6% | 5.7% | 55 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 12 | 3 | |
| Washington Redskins | 92 | 69 | 39 | 0 | 0 | 54 | 39 | 4.6% | 4% | 39 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 9 | 8 | |
| Oakland Raiders | 84 | 63 | 38 | 0 | 0 | 54 | 38 | 4.2% | 3.9% | 38 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 9 | 6 | |
| San Francisco 49ers | 81 | 61 | 36 | 0 | 0 | 48 | 36 | 4% | 3.7% | 36 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 7 | |
| Baltimore Ravens | 75 | 61 | 42 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 42 | 3.7% | 4.4% | 42 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 10 | 3 | |
| Kansas City Chiefs | 74 | 56 | 43 | 0 | 0 | 42 | 43 | 3.7% | 4.5% | 43 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 1 | |
| San Diego Chargers | 73 | 56 | 37 | 0 | 0 | 46 | 37 | 3.6% | 3.8% | 37 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 8 | 4 | |
| New England Patriots | 73 | 55 | 31 | 0 | 0 | 48 | 31 | 3.6% | 3.2% | 31 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 6 | |
| Green Bay Packers | 73 | 53 | 31 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 31 | 3.6% | 3.2% | 31 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 6 | |
| Denver Broncos | 72 | 55 | 37 | 0 | 0 | 42 | 37 | 3.6% | 3.8% | 37 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 4 | |
| Tampa Bay Buccaneers | 70 | 54 | 34 | 0 | 0 | 44 | 34 | 3.5% | 3.5% | 34 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 9 | 4 | |
| Cleveland Browns | 69 | 55 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 46 | 40 | 3.4% | 4.1% | 40 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 2 | |
| Dallas Cowboys | 69 | 50 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 34 | 33 | 3.4% | 3.4% | 33 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 4 | |
| Buffalo Bills | 65 | 51 | 32 | 0 | 0 | 44 | 32 | 3.2% | 3.3% | 32 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 8 | 4 | |
| Minnesota Vikings | 64 | 47 | 28 | 0 | 0 | 34 | 28 | 3.2% | 2.9% | 28 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 5 | |
| St. Louis Rams | 62 | 49 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 38 | 33 | 3.1% | 3.4% | 33 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 3 | |
| Arizona Cardinals | 61 | 48 | 35 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 35 | 3% | 3.6% | 35 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 2 | |
| Cincinnati Bengals | 61 | 47 | 29 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 29 | 3% | 3% | 29 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 4 | |
| Tennessee Titans | 60 | 46 | 29 | 0 | 0 | 38 | 29 | 3% | 3% | 29 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 4 | |
| Miami Dolphins | 60 | 44 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 34 | 25 | 3% | 2.6% | 25 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 5 | |
| Indianapolis Colts | 59 | 47 | 32 | 0 | 0 | 38 | 32 | 2.9% | 3.3% | 32 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 3 | |
| New York Jets | 58 | 43 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 24 | 2.9% | 2.5% | 24 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 5 | |
| Chicago Bears | 56 | 41 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 27 | 2.8% | 2.8% | 27 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 3 | |
| Philadelphia Eagles | 56 | 42 | 32 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 32 | 2.8% | 3.3% | 32 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 1 | |
| Detroit Lions | 54 | 40 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 23 | 2.7% | 2.4% | 23 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 4 | |
| New Orleans Saints | 51 | 39 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 25 | 2.5% | 2.6% | 25 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 3 | |
| Seattle Seahawks | 50 | 39 | 29 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 29 | 2.5% | 3% | 29 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 1 | |
| Pittsburgh Steelers | 50 | 34 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 19 | 2.5% | 2% | 19 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
| Atlanta Falcons | 43 | 35 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 24 | 2.1% | 2.5% | 24 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 2 | |
| Carolina Panthers | 43 | 32 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 19 | 2.1% | 2% | 19 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 3 | |
| Houston Texans | 42 | 34 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 22 | 2.1% | 2.3% | 22 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 2 | |
| Jacksonville Jaguars | 39 | 31 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 20 | 1.9% | 2.1% | 20 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 2 | |
| Los Angeles Raiders | 9 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.4% | 0.1% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
| Los Angeles Rams | 9 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.4% | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
| Baltimore Colts | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3% | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| Houston Oilers | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2% | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| Break total | 2020 | 1525 | 964 | 0 | 0 | 1194 | 964 | 100% | 100% | 964 | 1 | 74 | 125 | 236 | 125 | |
28 more below
Card % and Hit % describe the checklist, not the odds. They show each team's share of what's printed in these sets — exact from the checklist. They are not the probability of pulling a card, which would require print runs Panini doesn't publish.
By division
Card volume per team, ranked like standings. Bar = cards · green = hits.NFL
AFC East112 hits · 256 cards · 193 #d
- 1New England Patriots31h73
- 2Buffalo Bills32h65
- 3Miami Dolphins25h60
- 4New York Jets24h58
AFC North130 hits · 255 cards · 197 #d
- 1Baltimore Ravens42h75
- 2Cleveland Browns40h69
- 3Cincinnati Bengals29h61
- 4Pittsburgh Steelers19h50
NFC North109 hits · 247 cards · 181 #d
- 1Green Bay Packers31h73
- 2Minnesota Vikings28h64
- 3Chicago Bears27h56
- 4Detroit Lions23h54
NFC East120 hits · 218 cards · 167 #d
- 1New York Giants55h93
- 2Dallas Cowboys33h69
- 3Philadelphia Eagles32h56
NFC South102 hits · 207 cards · 160 #d
- 1Tampa Bay Buccaneers34h70
- 2New Orleans Saints25h51
- 3Atlanta Falcons24h43
- 4Carolina Panthers19h43
NFC West100 hits · 201 cards · 152 #d
- 1San Francisco 49ers36h81
- 2Arizona Cardinals35h61
- 3Seattle Seahawks29h50
- 4Los Angeles Rams9
AFC South103 hits · 200 cards · 158 #d
- 1Tennessee Titans29h60
- 2Indianapolis Colts32h59
- 3Houston Texans22h42
- 4Jacksonville Jaguars20h39
AFC West80 hits · 146 cards · 111 #d
- 1Kansas City Chiefs43h74
- 2Denver Broncos37h72
Methodology
Card % / Hit % — share, not odds. Card % and Hit % are each team's share of the checklist — the cards printed in these sets — computed exactly from what's listed. They are not the probability of pulling any given card, which would require print runs Panini doesn't publish.
Implied value. "Value" here means checklist-defined scarcity, not market price — a card counts as a hit if it's serial-numbered, an autograph, or a memorabilia relic. Packaddx doesn't price cards, so these numbers describe what's printed, not what it's worth.
Multi-team cards. A card printed with more than one team (e.g. a dual-team insert) counts under every team it's printed for, so per-team totals can add up to more than the break's overall card count. Each physical card is still only counted once in the break's totals.
Team attribution. A card is attributed to whichever team is printed on it at the time of the set's release — not a player's current or most recent team.