- 1Pittsburgh Penguins92
- 2Boston Bruins81
- 3Chicago Blackhawks72
2010 Panini Hockey Playoff Contenders
Break Analyzer Report
1158Total cards
233Hits
828Numbered
2331-of-1s
33Teams
Your break
2010 Panini Hockey Playoff Contenders
Highlights
The standout pulls, ranked.- 1Pittsburgh Penguins66
- 2Boston Bruins58
- 3Chicago Blackhawks53
- 1Boston Bruins13
- 2New Jersey Devils13
- 3Edmonton Oilers13
- 1Colorado Avalanche0
- 2Tampa Bay Lightning0
- 3Nashville Predators0
- 1Boston Bruins13
- 2New Jersey Devils13
- 3Edmonton Oilers13
- 1Minnesota North Stars4
- 2Phoenix Coyotes5
- 3Winnipeg Jets8
- 1Phoenix Coyotes40/100
- 2Calgary Flames35/100
- 3Nashville Predators31.6/100
No hidden-value teams in this break — hit share tracks card share closely across the board.
- 1Cam Fowler — Anaheim Ducks3
- 2Jeff Skinner — Carolina Hurricanes3
- 3Jordan Eberle — Edmonton Oilers3
All teams
Hover any column header for what it means. Click a row for player detail.Team | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pittsburgh Penguins | 92 | 66 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 7.9% | 4.3% | 10 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 11 | 19 | 21 | 0 | |
| Boston Bruins | 81 | 58 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 13 | 7% | 5.6% | 13 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 17 | 18 | 0 | |
| Chicago Blackhawks | 72 | 53 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 6.2% | 4.3% | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 18 | 17 | 1 | |
| Edmonton Oilers | 67 | 50 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 13 | 5.8% | 5.6% | 13 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 13 | 16 | 0 | |
| Detroit Red Wings | 64 | 46 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 5.5% | 3.4% | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 13 | 16 | 0 | |
| Philadelphia Flyers | 61 | 44 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 10 | 5.3% | 4.3% | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 12 | 15 | 0 | |
| Los Angeles Kings | 57 | 41 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 12 | 4.9% | 5.2% | 12 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 14 | 0 | |
| Montreal Canadiens | 56 | 41 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 7 | 4.8% | 3% | 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 14 | 13 | 0 | |
| Washington Capitals | 54 | 39 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 7 | 4.7% | 3% | 7 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 11 | 13 | 0 | |
| New Jersey Devils | 49 | 36 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 13 | 4.2% | 5.6% | 13 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 12 | 0 | |
| Vancouver Canucks | 48 | 35 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 4.1% | 3% | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 9 | 13 | 0 | |
| New York Rangers | 44 | 30 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 10 | 3.8% | 4.3% | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 10 | 0 | |
| San Jose Sharks | 40 | 29 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 9 | 3.5% | 3.9% | 9 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 11 | 0 | |
| Anaheim Ducks | 38 | 27 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 | 3.3% | 3.4% | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 0 | |
| Tampa Bay Lightning | 36 | 26 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 3.1% | 3% | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 0 | |
| Carolina Hurricanes | 36 | 26 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 | 3.1% | 3.4% | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 0 | |
| St. Louis Blues | 36 | 26 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 11 | 3.1% | 4.7% | 11 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 0 | |
| Colorado Avalanche | 35 | 26 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 9 | 3% | 3.9% | 9 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 8 | 0 | |
| Toronto Maple Leafs | 35 | 25 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 10 | 3% | 4.3% | 10 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 0 | |
| Atlanta Thrashers | 33 | 23 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 2.8% | 1.7% | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 7 | 0 | |
| Buffalo Sabres | 31 | 21 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 2.7% | 2.6% | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 6 | 0 | |
| New York Islanders | 28 | 20 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 2.4% | 2.1% | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 0 | |
| Dallas Stars | 24 | 16 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2.1% | 1.3% | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 0 | |
| Calgary Flames | 20 | 14 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 1.7% | 3% | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | |
| Nashville Predators | 19 | 13 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 1.6% | 2.6% | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | |
| Ottawa Senators | 17 | 12 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 1.5% | 2.1% | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | |
| Columbus Blue Jackets | 16 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1.4% | 1.3% | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 0 | |
| Minnesota Wild | 16 | 11 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 1.4% | 2.1% | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | |
| Florida Panthers | 10 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0.9% | 1.3% | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | |
| Quebec Nordiques | 9 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0.8% | 0.9% | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | |
| Winnipeg Jets | 8 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.7% | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | |
| Phoenix Coyotes | 5 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.4% | 0.9% | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| Minnesota North Stars | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3% | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| Break total | 1158 | 828 | 233 | 0 | 0 | 160 | 233 | 100% | 100% | 233 | 32 | 9 | 2 | 69 | 207 | 275 | 1 | |
25 more below
Card % and Hit % describe the checklist, not the odds. They show each team's share of what's printed in these sets — exact from the checklist. They are not the probability of pulling a card, which would require print runs Panini doesn't publish.
By division
Card volume per team, ranked like standings. Bar = cards · green = hits.NHL
Metropolitan66 hits · 380 cards · 272 #d
- 1Pittsburgh Penguins10h92
- 2Philadelphia Flyers10h61
- 3Washington Capitals7h54
- 4New Jersey Devils13h49
- 5New York Rangers10h44
- 6Carolina Hurricanes8h36
- 7New York Islanders5h28
- 8Columbus Blue Jackets3h16
Atlantic59 hits · 330 cards · 236 #d
- 1Boston Bruins13h81
- 2Detroit Red Wings8h64
- 3Montreal Canadiens7h56
- 4Tampa Bay Lightning7h36
- 5Toronto Maple Leafs10h35
- 6Buffalo Sabres6h31
- 7Ottawa Senators5h17
- 8Florida Panthers3h10
Pacific56 hits · 270 cards · 196 #d
- 1Edmonton Oilers13h67
- 2Los Angeles Kings12h57
- 3Vancouver Canucks7h48
- 4San Jose Sharks9h40
- 5Anaheim Ducks8h38
- 6Calgary Flames7h20
Central44 hits · 210 cards · 151 #d
- 1Chicago Blackhawks10h72
- 2St. Louis Blues11h36
- 3Colorado Avalanche9h35
- 4Dallas Stars3h24
- 5Nashville Predators6h19
- 6Minnesota Wild5h16
- 7Winnipeg Jets8
Methodology
Card % / Hit % — share, not odds. Card % and Hit % are each team's share of the checklist — the cards printed in these sets — computed exactly from what's listed. They are not the probability of pulling any given card, which would require print runs Panini doesn't publish.
Implied value. "Value" here means checklist-defined scarcity, not market price — a card counts as a hit if it's serial-numbered, an autograph, or a memorabilia relic. Packaddx doesn't price cards, so these numbers describe what's printed, not what it's worth.
Multi-team cards. A card printed with more than one team (e.g. a dual-team insert) counts under every team it's printed for, so per-team totals can add up to more than the break's overall card count. Each physical card is still only counted once in the break's totals.
Team attribution. A card is attributed to whichever team is printed on it at the time of the set's release — not a player's current or most recent team.