- 1Chicago Blackhawks115
- 2Montreal Canadiens104
- 3Philadelphia Flyers94
Break Analyzer Report
Your break
Highlights
The standout pulls, ranked.- 1Calgary Flames0
- 2Atlanta Thrashers0
- 3Montreal Canadiens0
- 1Calgary Flames0
- 2Atlanta Thrashers0
- 3Montreal Canadiens0
- 1Montreal Canadiens6
- 2Ottawa Senators6
- 3Tampa Bay Lightning6
- 1Montreal Canadiens6
- 2Ottawa Senators6
- 3Tampa Bay Lightning6
- 1Winnipeg Jets1
- 2Quebec Nordiques1
- 3Hartford Whalers1
- 1Ottawa Senators8.6/100
- 2Tampa Bay Lightning7.9/100
- 3Dallas Stars7/100
- 1Ottawa Senators+3.1pp
- 2Tampa Bay Lightning+2.9pp
- 3Dallas Stars+2.1pp
- 1Adam McQuaid — Boston Bruins1
- 2Alex Ovechkin — Washington Capitals1
- 3Andy Greene — New Jersey Devils1
All teams
Hover any column header for what it means. Click a row for player detail.Team | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chicago Blackhawks | 115 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.7% | 2% | |
| Montreal Canadiens | 104 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 4.2% | 5.9% | |
| Philadelphia Flyers | 94 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3.8% | 3% | |
| Pittsburgh Penguins | 87 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 3.5% | 4% | |
| Boston Bruins | 86 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 3.5% | 4% | |
| New Jersey Devils | 85 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3.4% | 5% | |
| Vancouver Canucks | 83 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3.4% | 2% | |
| San Jose Sharks | 82 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3.3% | 2% | |
| New York Islanders | 79 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 3.2% | 4% | |
| Anaheim Ducks | 78 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 3.2% | 5% | |
| Toronto Maple Leafs | 77 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 3.1% | 3% | |
| Detroit Red Wings | 77 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3.1% | 2% | |
| Colorado Avalanche | 76 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 3.1% | 5% | |
| Tampa Bay Lightning | 76 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3.1% | 5.9% | |
| Los Angeles Kings | 75 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 3% | 3% | |
| Buffalo Sabres | 73 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3% | 4% | |
| Phoenix Coyotes | 73 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3% | 2% | |
| New York Rangers | 72 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2.9% | 4% | |
| Minnesota Wild | 72 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 2.9% | 2% | |
| Washington Capitals | 71 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.9% | 2% | |
| Dallas Stars | 71 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2.9% | 5% | |
| Ottawa Senators | 70 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2.8% | 5.9% | |
| St. Louis Blues | 70 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.8% | 2% | |
| Edmonton Oilers | 69 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 2.8% | 4% | |
| Carolina Hurricanes | 68 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 2.8% | 3% | |
| Columbus Blue Jackets | 67 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2.7% | 2% | |
| Calgary Flames | 66 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.7% | 2% | |
| Nashville Predators | 66 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2.7% | 3% | |
| Atlanta Thrashers | 65 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2.6% | 3% | |
| Florida Panthers | 64 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2.6% | 1% | |
| Draft Prospect | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2% | 0% | |
| Winnipeg Jets | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 0% | |
| Quebec Nordiques | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 0% | |
| Hartford Whalers | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 0% | |
| Break total | 2464 | 0 | 101 | 101 | 0 | 85 | 0 | 100% | 100% | |
By division
Card volume per team, ranked like standings. Bar = cards · green = hits.NHL
- 1Montreal Canadiens6h104
- 2Boston Bruins4h86
- 3Detroit Red Wings2h77
- 4Toronto Maple Leafs3h77
- 5Tampa Bay Lightning6h76
- 6Buffalo Sabres4h73
- 7Ottawa Senators6h70
- 8Florida Panthers1h64
- 1Philadelphia Flyers3h94
- 2Pittsburgh Penguins4h87
- 3New Jersey Devils5h85
- 4New York Islanders4h79
- 5New York Rangers4h72
- 6Washington Capitals2h71
- 7Carolina Hurricanes3h68
- 8Columbus Blue Jackets2h67
- 1Chicago Blackhawks2h115
- 2Colorado Avalanche5h76
- 3Minnesota Wild2h72
- 4Dallas Stars5h71
- 5St. Louis Blues2h70
- 6Nashville Predators3h66
- 7Winnipeg Jets1
- 1Vancouver Canucks2h83
- 2San Jose Sharks2h82
- 3Anaheim Ducks5h78
- 4Los Angeles Kings3h75
- 5Edmonton Oilers4h69
- 6Calgary Flames2h66
Methodology
Card % / Hit % — share, not odds. Card % and Hit % are each team's share of the checklist — the cards printed in these sets — computed exactly from what's listed. They are not the probability of pulling any given card, which would require print runs Panini doesn't publish.
Implied value. "Value" here means checklist-defined scarcity, not market price — a card counts as a hit if it's serial-numbered, an autograph, or a memorabilia relic. Packaddx doesn't price cards, so these numbers describe what's printed, not what it's worth.
Multi-team cards. A card printed with more than one team (e.g. a dual-team insert) counts under every team it's printed for, so per-team totals can add up to more than the break's overall card count. Each physical card is still only counted once in the break's totals.
Team attribution. A card is attributed to whichever team is printed on it at the time of the set's release — not a player's current or most recent team.
