- 1Montreal Canadiens139
- 2Boston Bruins139
- 3Anaheim Ducks132
Break Analyzer Report
Your break
Highlights
The standout pulls, ranked.- 1Columbus Blue Jackets0
- 2Florida Panthers0
- 3Washington Capitals0
- 1Columbus Blue Jackets0
- 2Florida Panthers0
- 3Washington Capitals0
- 1Ottawa Senators6
- 2Colorado Avalanche6
- 3Anaheim Ducks6
- 1Anaheim Ducks10
- 2Boston Bruins10
- 3Minnesota Wild10
- 1Quebec Nordiques3
- 2Columbus Blue Jackets100
- 3Phoenix Coyotes100
- 1Minnesota Wild7.6/100
- 2Anaheim Ducks7.6/100
- 3Boston Bruins7.2/100
- 1Minnesota Wild+3.2pp
- 2Anaheim Ducks+3.1pp
- 3Boston Bruins+2.9pp
- 1Aaron Ness — New York Islanders1
- 2Alex Galchenyuk — Montreal Canadiens1
- 3Alex Killorn — Tampa Bay Lightning1
All teams
Hover any column header for what it means. Click a row for player detail.Team | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Montreal Canadiens | 139 | 0 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 24 | 0 | 3.9% | 6.2% | |
| Boston Bruins | 139 | 0 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 18 | 0 | 3.9% | 6.8% | |
| Anaheim Ducks | 132 | 0 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 24 | 0 | 3.7% | 6.8% | |
| Dallas Stars | 131 | 0 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 23 | 0 | 3.7% | 5.5% | |
| Minnesota Wild | 131 | 0 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 24 | 0 | 3.7% | 6.8% | |
| Colorado Avalanche | 129 | 0 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 18 | 0 | 3.6% | 4.8% | |
| New York Rangers | 128 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 12 | 0 | 3.6% | 4.8% | |
| Ottawa Senators | 127 | 0 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 24 | 0 | 3.6% | 4.8% | |
| San Jose Sharks | 126 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 12 | 0 | 3.5% | 4.1% | |
| Edmonton Oilers | 124 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 18 | 0 | 3.5% | 4.8% | |
| Tampa Bay Lightning | 124 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 3.5% | 4.1% | |
| Philadelphia Flyers | 123 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 12 | 0 | 3.5% | 4.8% | |
| Florida Panthers | 122 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 18 | 0 | 3.4% | 4.1% | |
| St. Louis Blues | 122 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 3.4% | 4.8% | |
| Toronto Maple Leafs | 122 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 12 | 0 | 3.4% | 3.4% | |
| Winnipeg Jets | 120 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 18 | 0 | 3.4% | 4.1% | |
| Vancouver Canucks | 119 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 3.3% | 3.4% | |
| Chicago Blackhawks | 118 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3.3% | 2.1% | |
| Washington Capitals | 117 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 3.3% | 4.1% | |
| Pittsburgh Penguins | 117 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 3.3% | 4.1% | |
| Detroit Red Wings | 115 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 12 | 0 | 3.2% | 4.1% | |
| Los Angeles Kings | 115 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 3.2% | 2.7% | |
| New Jersey Devils | 114 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 3.2% | 3.4% | |
| New York Islanders | 108 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 3% | 3.4% | |
| Buffalo Sabres | 107 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 3% | 2.1% | |
| Nashville Predators | 106 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 3% | 2.7% | |
| Carolina Hurricanes | 106 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 3% | 2.7% | |
| Calgary Flames | 105 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 3% | 2.7% | |
| Columbus Blue Jackets | 100 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 2.8% | 2.1% | |
| Phoenix Coyotes | 100 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2.8% | 2.1% | |
| Quebec Nordiques | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1% | 0% | |
| Break total | 3556 | 0 | 146 | 98 | 48 | 359 | 0 | 100% | 100% | |
By division
Card volume per team, ranked like standings. Bar = cards · green = hits.NHL
- 1Boston Bruins10h139
- 2Montreal Canadiens9h139
- 3Ottawa Senators7h127
- 4Tampa Bay Lightning6h124
- 5Florida Panthers6h122
- 6Toronto Maple Leafs5h122
- 7Detroit Red Wings6h115
- 8Buffalo Sabres3h107
- 1New York Rangers7h128
- 2Philadelphia Flyers7h123
- 3Pittsburgh Penguins6h117
- 4Washington Capitals6h117
- 5New Jersey Devils5h114
- 6New York Islanders5h108
- 7Carolina Hurricanes4h106
- 8Columbus Blue Jackets3h100
- 1Dallas Stars8h131
- 2Minnesota Wild10h131
- 3Colorado Avalanche7h129
- 4St. Louis Blues7h122
- 5Winnipeg Jets6h120
- 6Chicago Blackhawks3h118
- 7Nashville Predators4h106
- 1Anaheim Ducks10h132
- 2San Jose Sharks6h126
- 3Edmonton Oilers7h124
- 4Vancouver Canucks5h119
- 5Los Angeles Kings4h115
- 6Calgary Flames4h105
Methodology
Card % / Hit % — share, not odds. Card % and Hit % are each team's share of the checklist — the cards printed in these sets — computed exactly from what's listed. They are not the probability of pulling any given card, which would require print runs Panini doesn't publish.
Implied value. "Value" here means checklist-defined scarcity, not market price — a card counts as a hit if it's serial-numbered, an autograph, or a memorabilia relic. Packaddx doesn't price cards, so these numbers describe what's printed, not what it's worth.
Multi-team cards. A card printed with more than one team (e.g. a dual-team insert) counts under every team it's printed for, so per-team totals can add up to more than the break's overall card count. Each physical card is still only counted once in the break's totals.
Team attribution. A card is attributed to whichever team is printed on it at the time of the set's release — not a player's current or most recent team.
